Entries Tagged as 'Government'

Housing “Rescue”

So, did you read about the housing rescue that passed the House? In case you didn’t, let me sum it up for you:

There shall be no economic freedom in this country. You shall not be free to engage in monetary risk at all, because government has decided that’s not safe. You will not buy a house in the hopes it will increase in value if you and the seller agree, because government says that’s not safe. If you do it, you will be jailed. In addition, because everyone now has a right to housing, it’s much too dangerous to leave housing to the free market, so government shall control any and all housing transactions. In addition, government will now buy and sell houses because they know better than you how much houses should cost. If you want a house, ask government, and they will buy it for you. The conversion to complete socialism in the mortgage industry is now complete.

Seriously, that’s what it says. The government just spent (presuming it passes the Senate) nearly $5 trillion dollars (even if they won’t admit that’s what they spent). They have completely taken over the mortgage industry because government will now back ALL mortgage loans. They are going into the business of buying and selling houses — go ahead, try and compete with someone who has literally unlimited money. They’re buying votes from all sorts of people by taking money from responsible working people. I am starting to understand more people like Ed Brown who simply stop paying taxes because government is so corrupt it’s insane.

Go ahead, keep thinking this is a free country. You’re just plain wrong. We currently have some sort of government that’s between communism and total socialism. Government controls industry and we’re only allowed to vote for those that the two political parties choose. Oh, how I yearn for freedom.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Mooresville Recycling

How about I show you how government specifically is interested in control and power instead of freedom and people? Here it is, on a tiny town level. Mooresville, NC has around 10,700 households. It’s not a big place. Their government is considering forcing people adding recycling. Yes, I’m well aware this is how you force people to recycle because you make it voluntary at first, then mandatory later on to “save costs.” It’s crappy, horrible, controlling, anti-freedom government at it’s worst.

But the government put together a presentation that shows they honestly do not care one bit about how much money they spend. Sure, if you take the presentation at face value, it looks like this effort would actually bring income to the city. But if you look a little closer, you see that’s not actually the case.

In one place, the presentation bases all its numbers, including those that show a “profit,” on a 70% household participation. However, on the previous page, they show the nationwide average figures of participation is 40-80%, and their own goal is only 50%! So the city is going to try and get 50% participation, but bases ALL the calculations and figures on 70%! I don’t know if you can call that outright lying, but it sure is dishonest in every sense of the word. They also don’t mention in the presentation the line that helps them “earn” money listed as “tax income.”

Worse, they go on to claim that it would cost more if they let a private company do the collections for them — and then provide the data to show that’s completely untrue! The presentation claims that a private company will pick up recycling for just $3.75 per house per month. That’s all. So what would happen in a freedom-based country? The claimed 72% of town residents that want recycling could just pay $3.75 a month and get it. That’s it. There would be no government employees to pay. There would be no administrators to pay. There would be no mismanagement by the government. And best of all — the 28% of residents who do not want to be forced to pay to make other people feel good WOULDN’T HAVE TO PAY!

In other words, the options are clear. Government can use force to require people to pay them, and government will spend nearly $70 a year per household; or people could be free to contract with other free people to get curbside recycling for less than $4 a month (around $48 a year). I bet you can guess what the board “suggested” that the town do, can’t you? Government today, even in small towns, is about using force to control people and nothing more.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Stimulus: Republican vs. Democrat

The “big” news is that the Democrats want to pass a new stimulus plan. Now I’m no longer a fan of the big-government Republican party, but some times they are actually different from the Democrats (not often). In this case, the difference is rather extreme:

Republican Stimulus: Give people some of their own money.

Democrat Stimulus: Let government spend more of the people’s money.

Then again, you can consider what would happen if people like Ron Paul, Libertarians, or the Constitution Party were running the place:

Stimulus: Government stop collecting and spending money that’s not theirs.

Popularity: 7% [?]

Who Said It?

Let’s play a game, shall we? Some important government officials said the following statements. Can you guess who said them — or more importantly, WHEN?

1. “There is no cause to worry. The high tide of prosperity will continue.”

2. “It’s a safe banking system, a sound banking system. Our regulators are on top of it. This is a very manageable situation.”

3. “The Government’s business is in sound condition.”

4. “Our economy has got very strong long-term fundamentals, solid fundamentals. And you know, your policy-makers here, regulators, we’re being very vigilant.”

5. “Reports to the Department of Commerce indicate that business is in a satisfactory condition [today].”

6. “But again, it’s a safe banking system, a sound banking system. Our regulators are on top of it. This is a very manageable situation.”

7. “Definite signs that business and industry have turned the corner from the temporary period of emergency that followed deflation of the speculative market were seen today.”

8. “The fundamental strength of the US economy, and I’m talking about the long-term fundamentals, I believe they
compare favorably in this country with any other developed industrial nation around the world.”

9. “We have hit bottom and are on the upswing.”

10. “The bottom line is this: We’re going through a tough time. But our economy has continued growing, consumers are spending, businesses are investing, exports continue increasing, and American productivity remains strong.”

So, did you guess?

All of the statements above that are even-numbered were made in the past month by the Bush administration — either by Bush himself, or his secretary of treasury.

All of the statements above that are odd-numbered were made by members of the Hoover administration — between September 1929 and September 1930. And remember, in the first half of 1930, the government spent more money while people spent less. Wages did not start their substantial drop until 1931 — after all these statements were made. And the Great Depression really got into full swing in late 1930 and didn’t hit bottom until 1933.

Popularity: 5% [?]

US Economy vs. Democrats

So let’s see… the US Treasury secretary says that things are bad — and they’re going to stay bad. Now this is someone who should know what they’re talking about. He says that the banking system is fine, but

The three big issues we’re facing right now are, first, the housing correction which is at the heart of the slowdown; secondly, turmoil of the capital markets; and thirdly, the high oil prices, which are going to prolong the slowdown

While the banking system is fine, banks are failing. Listen to my words, not reality. War is Peace. I understand.

So what is our ever-faithful Democrat-led Congress doing about these three big issues? They’re working hard to stop people from getting mortgages by crushing freedom. They’re working to pass laws to make it even harder for people to get loans, and make it easier to throw people in jail for lending money. So their solution to the housing correction is to make LESS people buy houses. Great.

The capital markets are in turmoil. What are the Democrat plans there? Spend trillions on government programs. And yes, capital gains taxes will have to be increased in order to pay for such employment programs. They are working to raise taxes to ensure that there will be less invested in companies so the capital markets will get worse.

How about oil prices? Oh right, Democrats are stopping drilling to ensure oil prices stay high, and they’re actually going to RAISE gas taxes to make sure gasoline stays affordable only for the “rich.”

So there you have it — Democrats in Congress are working hard, doing everything they possibly can to actually make the economy WORSE than it already is. No, seriously. Why? Because they believe that the worse the economy is, the better chances they have in the fall elections. Sorry, but that’s how politicians operate today. They want to get elected and will quite literally do anything they can, no matter the consequences, if they can just get re-elected and get more power.

What’s the solution? Vote them all out. Vote for a Libertarian. Vote for a non-politician. Don’t vote for lawyers. And yes, I’m aware that many people don’t have that option at all. In that case, just keep your ammo dry (while it’s still legal to own ammo) and wait until the people finally have had enough.

Popularity: 10% [?]

Congress on Free Speech

So, have you heard the latest from Congress regarding freedom of speech? In a nutshell, Congress, led by Democrats, are saying that if you are a member of Congress, you are not allowed to speak to anyone about anything that happens in the Congress — at least not in electronic form.

It appears that you’re allowed to speak about what happens in Congress, but if you make a blog posting, or put other information on a web site, the Democrats will shut you down. So if you want to explain to your constituents (I know, it’s an outdated concept) what’s happening and why you voted a certain way on a law, you cannot do so via the Internet. If you do, Democrats will actually bring you up on charges.

Despite what the Democrats claim, they want total control. They want to control all access you have to them and their inner workings in Congress. They know that if they are filtered through the formerly mainstream media, that they will only be shown in a good light. They also know that the Internet can show them as they truly are — which is why they so strongly oppose freedom of speech. Sorry, but that IS today’s Democrat Party. Don’t believe me? Watch how bad speech rules will get if Obama wins. After all, Obama wants to create a HUGE internal federal secret police force to enforce his own rules and desires on people.

Popularity: 25% [?]

The Foreclosure “Crisis”

I have been trying to explain why the US government is completely and totally wrong and well-beyond it’s Constitutional boundaries regarding the recent economic news. I have been trying to explain that most of the current problems are because of government interference in freedom. I just read a news release from Chris Cole, running for the US Senate on the Libertarian Party ticket in North Carolina (against Liddy Dole (RINO)):

From Christopher Cole, Libertarian for US Senate

I am a collector of antique American currency. Included in my collection - and my personal favorites- are several gold certificates. Most Americans aren’t even aware that we once had bills that bore legends like “20 Dollars in Gold Coin Payable to the Bearer on Demand”. They are especially surprised by their orange back, intended to emphasize their value in gold. (The twenty bears the image of George Washington familiar from our modern one-dollar Federal Reserve Note.)

Why do I mention my collection? Because that twenty-dollar gold certificate was pegged at an exchange value of one ounce of gold. It was worth that ounce the first year, the second year, even ten years after it was printed. What is the price of an ounce of gold now? Over $800. In other words, the value of our currency has fallen more than fortyfold! No wonder the government no longer issues gold certificates, and no wonder our savings rate has fallen to about one-half of one percent. It is against self-interest to hold money that is worth less, the longer you hold on to it.

Thus, we have the setup for our current credit and foreclosure crisis.

When money is saved, its owner intends its use in the future, and the bank uses it to make loans, such as for the creation of new businesses. More savings mean lower interest rates, which in turn send a market signal for businesses and individuals to invest for future demand. The real interest rates based on savings have been replaced by artificial signals from Federal Reserve-set interest rates, along with home- and land-ownership incentives by government. The result has been a market expectation of future increases in demand for homes and land, and thus, a real-estate price bubble. All of which was fine, as long as there was an ACTUAL demand in the future. What has happened is that demand no longer matches the fake interest signal, and the housing bubble has burst.

The solution offered by politicians, such as Republican Senator Elizabeth Dole, is to pump Federal Reserve loans into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to finance MORE loans for folks who couldn’t otherwise
qualify for them, setting up ANOTHER housing bubble and MORE foreclosures, not fewer. Quick fixes can always be expected to result in longterm problems.

The longterm solutions are harder. Here are the ones I would institute as Senator:

First, restore the gold standard, so Americans can know that they will not lose their savings to inflation.

Second, phase out government programs that subsidize home ownership. This must include setting a date for the revocation of the charters of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (I suggest four years), so that they will cease sending false market signals, without stranding current buyers and sellers.

And third, abolish the Federal Reserve System, enabling interest rates to float in response to real savings, rather than to government social engineering.

For additional information, I recommend this article from the Ludwig von Mises Institute, an economic think tank based at Auburn University.


Christopher Cole
Libertarian nominee, US Senate
Huntersville, NC

Popularity: 26% [?]

On The Mortgage and Banking Crisis

So, have you been reading all the news about the current economic crisis in America? Have you, personally, lost millions of dollars in recent days? Or are you satisfied that you’re fine, you just head to work and get paid, and go buy your groceries, wondering what this is all about? Perhaps you’re thinking that this won’t effect you because you don’t have money invested in the stock market in the financial sector. Or do you? Do you really know where all your company’s retirement plans are invested? Do you know where all your mutual fund investments are stored? Let’s say you do, and you’re still not in those funds. So none of this will effect you, right? Certainly it shouldn’t, but it appears more and more that it will.

You see, our government has completely and totally lost track of the Constitution. Those elected officials in Washington, DC are prepared to completely violate their words and their solemn oath. All the Congressmen in office now swore:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God

But that was all just talk. All the actions they are considering this week are absolutely, unquestionably, in direct opposition to that statement.

[Read more →]

Popularity: 26% [?]

Vote Libertarian in North Carolina in 2008

Why? Remember that 9% approval rating? It’s not throwing away your vote, especially in North Carolina. If 90% of the people don’t like the current government and just half of them vote Libertarian, freedom will have a chance. Want to know why? Just watch this video:

That’s Mike Munger. He’s running for North Carolina governor. I’m voting for him.

Popularity: 27% [?]

NC Senate Creates Criminals

So I bet you didn’t read the big news in the North Carolina media this weekend. But I guess that’s because the media is more interesting is getting you angry at Republicans so the media can win the elections and keep advancing socialism. Meanwhile, the North Carolina Senate passed a law that creates tens of thousands of new criminals. In addition, it makes tens of thousands of people who are absolutely no danger to anyone unable to purchase firearms. Why? Because government simply does not like people to be armed and will not put up with the damn citizens having guns. No, really, that’s why.

The new law makes it illegal for anyone who has ever been referred by a judge to a psychologist ineligible to own a gun. You can be sure that government employees (policemen) will be exempt from this (and lots of other) law. And to get the law passed, they did add a section that claims that if you are barred from buying a gun, you can beg and plead government for permission once again. And of course, it will be up to the black-robed ones to give you permission.

So now, in North Carolina, if you go to a judge because you got a speeding ticket and the judge decides you need “anger counseling,” you’re barred for life from buying a gun in the United States. Seriously, that’s what the law says. I guess the black market in guns will just have to continue to expand.

Popularity: 28% [?]

Manning Rules Bribery Legal

Judge Howard Manning (self-appointed literal King of North Carolina Education) has ruled that it is legal to take money by force from some people and use that money to give to other people in return for services. And yes, I’m well aware that most people, upon reading that, would claim that it’s bribery and theft. But this judge, ruling for the Durham County Superior Court, has said it’s not.

Now wait — before you head out and start taking money from people — that’s illegal for you. And wait before you start using other people’s money to bribe companies — that’s illegal for you, too. But it’s not illegal when government does it — which is what King Manning has proclaimed (and you had better not question the king).

King Manning has ruled that government can take taxpayer money and use it to bribe different businesses to locate to their community — favoring whatever business that gives them the most cash. Gee, what’s next, government taking private land to give to businesses that give them cash? Oh right, that’s already happening. Oh, how I yearn for freedom.

Popularity: 30% [?]

CMS: Politics over Education

If you have any doubt about the priorities of the government education system, just watch the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS) in action. They, and I’m sure most government schools around the county, have one priority: cash.

Yesterday the superintendent (who earns nearly half a million dollars a year in salary and other compensation) announced job cuts. And of course, he blamed it on not having enough money. Why? Because it’s a political move, plain and simple, designed to get voters to support giving even MORE cash to the schools. The facts are clear (even if you won’t get them from his allies in the media): the school district has MORE money than last year to spend. They have enough to give every employee a raise of at least three percent. But that’s not how much Peter Gorman (the $500,000+ superintendent) personally wanted, so he’s going to fire people until the government gives him, personally, more cash.

Extort: To obtain from another by coercion or intimidation.

This is the function and purpose of the government school system. They seriously and honestly do not care one bit about the children or education in any way, shape, or form. I wish there were some way to make people understand that. I guess most people don’t want to hear that because their kids are in the government prison school system, so they don’t want to admit that the school stinks as bad as it does.

Popularity: 29% [?]

War on Freedom

So, do you think the war on freedom will ever end? I honestly don’t. I think it’s been going on for centuries, and while sometimes freedom gets ahead, the war on freedom will continue as long as governments exist. I was just reading an article about the next “war” — the possibly coming “war on illegals.” Now I don’t think that war is coming — neither Obama or McCain have ANY interest in stopping any illegals at any time. And no, the two of them honestly don’t care what YOU want, they will do what they want. But looking at the article, it writes about the various previous “wars” that are all utter and total failures:

The war on alcohol. How did prohibition work out? The war on poverty? $10 trillion and we still have poor people (and they STILL vote Democrat?). The war on drugs? Hundreds of completely innocent people dead. I think the big connection between all these is freedom. Government is the enemy of freedom. All these “wars” are about taking freedom away from otherwise law abiding, peaceful citizens that are not harming anyone.

And the war continues.

The latest is a “war” on gas prices and lending. Government is working hard to take away the freedom to invest money. Yes, because government wants to do something, and because their enemy is freedom, they’re trying to stop people from buying and selling oil. The only effect that will have is a loss of freedom. Oh, and slightly delayed increases in prices of gasoline. Government also wants to reduce economic freedom even more by stopping you from lending money. That’s right, if you have cash and want to lend it to someone, the government wants to stop you.

It’s a clear war on freedom, and the government is the enemy.

Popularity: 27% [?]

Congressional Approvals

I’m sure many of you fine readers have heard about the record low Congressional approval numbers. I mean, nine percent? Over 90% of people think you’re a failure at your job? Knowing that in large groups, you will always have “that 10%,” this is almost a complete and total rejection of the entire US Congress. That really is news. I wonder how those people can do their jobs, knowing that almost no one thinks they’re doing it right. Oh wait, I remember — because they honestly don’t care (most of them). They’re the elite and they know better than you what’s good for you. If you don’t think they’re doing their job right, it’s not because they’re not, it’s because you don’t understand their job.

What a load.

What’s even more interesting is the fact that of the same 90% who think that Congress is completely worthless at the moment, the majority of people say they’ll vote to re-elect their Congressman. I guess if Congress is truly dysfunctional (and it is), does this mean that the people they’re electing are even MORE dysfunctional? It sure does give a new meaning to “throwing away your vote.” This poll, if even slightly accurate, says that the VAST majority of Americans are going to vote to re-elect someone they think is completely and utterly incompetent. How can that be?

I suggest it’s because so few people have a choice. I know in North Carolina, and I’m sure many other places, there’s simply no competition. In the two-party system, you pick one of the following one candidates. Either that or your district is drawn to include 70% one party, so the other party candidate doesn’t have a chance, anyway.

I’d like to suggest that there’s other options. In North Carolina, for the first time in years, you actually have a choice. The North Carolina Libertarian Party has actually been permitted to be on the ballot. No, the Democrats and Republicans don’t like it, but they were forced to allow it. If you’re in North Carolina, go take a look — the Libertarian Party has almost 40 candidate running for various offices statewide. I’m not asking you to agree with the entire party platform — do you agree with ANY party platform 100%? I just think votes for Libertarians really can send a message to the Congress that we really, really don’t like what they’re doing.

Popularity: 25% [?]

NC Budget

So, the Democrats in North Carolina just passed a new budget. Twenty-one BILLION dollars worth of a budget. Yes, that’s $21,355,967,434.00. For just one state. And I, for one, think that’s an awful lot of money, even if the Democrat Legislators don’t care — because after all, it’s not their money, they don’t really care how much they spend, do they?

$2.6 billion goes to The University of North Carolina. What? You actually thought that tuition paid for schools? Obviously not. Wouldn’t that be neat, though? To have optional institutions actually take in money to pay for their own operations? Instead, you, the taxpayer, whether you’re using the schools or not, will pay for other people to get an education. And that’s on top of the just under $1 billion given to the Community College system that the Democrats want to educate illegal immigrants (while claiming taxpayer money isn’t used to educate illegals).

But hey, how can we possible live without giving $78 million to the “Rural Economic Development Center?” I guess without that expenditure, no one would ever build anything in any rural areas. Whew, glad government could save that one for me.

And remember all those “free” bonds that have passed over the years? Yes, just like the one that’s one the ballot this fall for “roads?” This year North Carolina had to pay $678 MILLION in debt service. Any of you good readers have a credit card where you carry a balance? You see that little “finance charge” section? Right, that’s money you’re giving away — and North Carolina just spend $678 million on their finance charges — for just this year. There’s a reason that you’re not supposed to borrow from Peter to pay Paul.

But back to roads for a moment. Now remember, in North Carolina, the roads are crappy. They are under construction often — but usually long after they should have been repaired. They are not expanded until many years too late. Many roads are absolutely filled with potholes. The Democrats are trying to build toll roads because they claim they don’t have enough money to build roads. And this fall, Democrats are pushing to borrow huge sums of money because they claim they don’t have enough cash for roads. Now, shall we examine the Democrat budget for 2008-2009?

Under “income to the state,” we find $172 million transfer from the Highway Trust Fund. The next line has $17 million from the Highway Fund. To be clear, this is money that was already collected for the sole purpose of building roads — and the Democrats have taken it FROM the road funds and placed it in the general fund. The Democrats have been doing this for over a decade. And this year they actually stole LESS from the highway funds than in the past!

Know what else the Democrats have voted to do with money that was collected to build and repair roads? $32 million for ferry operations. Which would you rather have — cheap ferry service or good roads? Which helps more people? $21 million to railroads. Once again, which carries more people and goods to places they need to be — highways or railroads? But wait, there’s more!

There’s one line in the budget that just really lets you know where the priorities of the Democrats in North Carolina lie. The Democrats voted to take over $250 million that was collected to build and repair roads and “transfer [it to] other state agencies.” In other words, Democrats had $250 million to build roads and they chose to give it to their pals in state government including things like “Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement Compensation.”

When you hear legislators complaining that they “need” more money, realize what they’re really saying. They’re saying they “need” more money so they can spend it on things they like — not because the state needs a dime to actually do the things they should be doing. And while we do need roads, we do NOT need to borrow money to build them — instead we need to use the money we already have — we just need fiscally responsible people to account for it.

Popularity: 25% [?]

R.I.P. Jesse Helms

For those who did not know, US Senator Jesse Helms passed away a few days ago. His funeral is today. He was an absolutely amazing man.

To those who were outside of North Carolina, don’t believe all you heard or read about him. The media always portrayed him as an evil, heartless man. Nothing could be further from the truth. He was a truly kind and compassionate man — who always stood by his clear conservative principles. He has already been sorely missed from the US Senate. But I know they’re rejoicing in heaven today.

I wish there could be more men in politics like Mr. Helms. In today’s climate, I’m sure he would be even more vilified. Why? I believe it’s primarily because Senator Helms actually believed in right and wrong. That’s a concept that seems to be utterly and completely missing from the media today. Yes, there is right and wrong — and Senator Helms knew that. Rest in peace, good Senator. You did well.

Popularity: 26% [?]

Happy Birthday

Happy Birthday, America. I wish these could be under happier circumstances. I wish this were a day to celebrate freedom. Unfortunately freedom in America simply does not exist. Perhaps these words, written so long ago, are needed again — this time directed AT Washington, DC. Read this, everyone, please:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

—–

Replace “he” with “The Federal Government” in most of the list of complaints and you will find it quite accurate today, sadly.

Popularity: 33% [?]

Illinois Deserves Better

Book Review: Illinois Deserves Better, 2008. Bambenek, J., Behrend. B. Booksurge Publishing.

I purchased this book on the advice of the author. Well, who else would know that it’s a good book, right? Well, I bought it, not being a citizen of Illinois, to see what was in it. Did you know that the state of Illinois, the Land that brought us the one president who did the most to destroy states’ rights (Lincoln) actually requires a vote every 20 years to determine if the citizens want to hold a Constitutional Convention. This book is written in support of voters requesting a convention this year when voters go to the polls.

The book is plain and well-written. It is divided into 5 sections — Introduction, The State of the State, The Constitutional Convention Process, Arguments against a Convention, and Potential Reforms. The supports for a Constitutional Convention are clearly outlined and very well-supported. After reading this book, you will have a hard time saying that Illinois does NOT need a Constitutional Convention — unless you just live in complete denial of the facts described in the book.

A good portion of the book is spent on the hope for a better Illinois. Instead of being just a book that tries to scare people into supporting one political position, almost half of the book describes all the wonderful possibilities that can be brought about should the voters decide to hold a Convention. If you’re interested in the Constitutional Convention process, or if you are a voter in Illinois, I strongly suggest you get your hands on this book. Of course, it would be even more significant if states actually had rights today…

Popularity: 42% [?]

Welfare Preachers

Another quote from that incredible classic and prophetic novel, Atlas Shrugged. And this one, although written back in the 1950s, could and does apply to 95% of today’s Congressman. This speech is addressed to every last one of those people in Congress who is voting to take tax money from working people to give it to anyone else who didn’t earn it: welfare, corporate tax breaks, “non-profit” organizations, and “disaster” relief:

“That’s what you want — that’s what all of you really want — not money, not material benefits, not economic security, not any of the handouts you keep demanding.” She spoke in a flat monotone, as if reciting her thoughts to herself, intent upon giving the solid identity of words to the torturous shreds of chaos twisting in her mind. “All of you welfare preachers — it’s not unearned money that you’re after. You want handouts, but of a different kind. I’m a gold-digger of the spirit, you said, because I look for value. Then you, the welfare preachers… it’s the spirit that you want to loot. I never thought and nobody ever told us how it could be thought of and what it would mean — the unearned in spirit. But that is what you want. You want unearned love. You want unearned admiration. You want unearned greatness. You want to be a man like Hank Reardon without the necessity of being what he is. Without the necessity of being anything. Without… the necessity.. of being.”

Popularity: 40% [?]

Another Firing For Religion

Once again, we have yet another example in America of someone being fired for the crime of being Christian. Don’t believe the crap about “branding crosses,” that’s just totally made up crap. Look at the picture. You really have to WANT to see a cross to see a cross there. And no one was ever injured. Nope, sorry, they weren’t.

What were the biggest “crimes” committed by this man? Two of them. The first is that he dared science students to question science. That’s heresy to government today. You’re simply not allowed to question ANYTHING that the government or government scientists claim are fact. No, it’s not the middle ages where the church is not allowed to be questioned, it’s America today where the church of science is not allowed to be questioned. That shows you how much science has changed in the years. When I went to school, science was ABOUT asking questions and finding answers. Apparently today it’s about accepting what you are told without question.

The second, and more serious offense this man committed was that he dared own a Bible. And yes, he actually took it into the government house of worship (school) where such things are not allowed. You see, in the government house of worship, you may only worship government and may not question ANYTHING government says or tells you. If you bring any other sort of Christian religious emblem there, you will be removed by force.

Unfortunately, there’s really not any other country where you actually have more freedom of religion. Christians, welcome to the end days where you will be persecuted for your beliefs. It’s in America now, whether you want to admit it or not.

Popularity: 43% [?]