Entries Tagged as 'America'

Housing “Rescue”

So, did you read about the housing rescue that passed the House? In case you didn’t, let me sum it up for you:

There shall be no economic freedom in this country. You shall not be free to engage in monetary risk at all, because government has decided that’s not safe. You will not buy a house in the hopes it will increase in value if you and the seller agree, because government says that’s not safe. If you do it, you will be jailed. In addition, because everyone now has a right to housing, it’s much too dangerous to leave housing to the free market, so government shall control any and all housing transactions. In addition, government will now buy and sell houses because they know better than you how much houses should cost. If you want a house, ask government, and they will buy it for you. The conversion to complete socialism in the mortgage industry is now complete.

Seriously, that’s what it says. The government just spent (presuming it passes the Senate) nearly $5 trillion dollars (even if they won’t admit that’s what they spent). They have completely taken over the mortgage industry because government will now back ALL mortgage loans. They are going into the business of buying and selling houses — go ahead, try and compete with someone who has literally unlimited money. They’re buying votes from all sorts of people by taking money from responsible working people. I am starting to understand more people like Ed Brown who simply stop paying taxes because government is so corrupt it’s insane.

Go ahead, keep thinking this is a free country. You’re just plain wrong. We currently have some sort of government that’s between communism and total socialism. Government controls industry and we’re only allowed to vote for those that the two political parties choose. Oh, how I yearn for freedom.

Popularity: 2% [?]

War on Christians Continues

Oh sure, go ahead and dismiss this post because of the title. I’m sorry, but it’s true. There are a LOT of people in this world who honestly despise Christians and will do anything they can to destroy everything associated with Christianity (including freedom). And I’m not just talking about the Muslims who want to literally kill every Christian.

In Brasil, you may soon be jailed for reading the Bible. Yup, they don’t like those judgmental people down there in Brazil. Anyone want to defend that one? 5 years in prison for reading the Bible. Anyone?

Oh, I know we’re not that bad here in America. Instead, we’re supposed to hide being Christian. If not, you get fired. No, not for telling gays anything at all. If you simply don’t want to help someone be gay now, you are FIRED. It’s no longer about “accepting” gays — if it ever was — now if you do not openly approve and completely SUPPORT the gay lifestyle, you are not allowed in this country.

I want freedom. I wish the radical gays did, too.

Popularity: 19% [?]

Freddie and Fannie

I’m writing this post before the markets open on Monday morning, so who knows what effect the market will have on the information here. But what I’m writing about is the “corporations” of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. For those who don’t know anything about these entities, it’s pretty complex. But to make things simpler, they’re corporations that are government-sponsored. In other words, it’s a corporation, but it’s not one that a few people got together and formed with investment money — it’s a corporation that was formed by the government and has government backing.

This corporation also happens to be in business. It’s business is to give mortgages to people who aren’t trustworthy enough to get mortgages. It exists to take serious risks on people borrowing money to get houses — risks so high that individuals and banks run by non-government people don’t want to take them. And these companies have been taking these risks for a long time. They’ve taken so many risks that this corporation now has around $5 trillion worth of outstanding loans.

Most of the other companies that had been formed to take on high-risk loans, such as American Home Mortgage and Countrywide have already gone bankrupt. The only high-risk lender left is Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. And on Friday, their stock prices dropped to nearly worthless. I guess it’s good that it happened on Friday, as that gives the markets the weekend to wonder and figure out what happens on Monday.

You see, if these companies go bankrupt, there’s trouble. $5 trillion is a lot of money. Investors include lots of foreign countries, too. And if the company goes bankrupt, all that investment is gone. At the same time, the implicit indication has always been there that the US government is backing that company. In other words, if the company is set to go bankrupt, the US government has always agreed to back up that money — which means that if the government does back them up, that’s $5 trillion added to the US debt overnight. And no, the government cannot afford to add $5 trillion in one day (it’s about $9.5 trillion now). After all, they just spent about $6 billion covering Indy bank’s losses.

So what’s a country to do?
[Read more →]

Popularity: 30% [?]

Guns Are Scary

Mary C. Schulken, Democrat opinion writer for the Charlotte Observer, is terrified. No, she’s not scared because violent crime is on the increase in Charlotte. No, she’s not scared because the Charlotte police department is more interested in being social workers than policemen. And no, she’s not even scared because her car was stolen by thieves recently. So why is she suddenly scared? Because she just now found out that a few people who are not policemen have guns.

I know, it’s really scary. I can only guess that Miss Schulken has so insulated herself from the reality of the world that she honestly didn’t realize that people have owned and been carrying guns for, well, as long as this country has existed. I imagine the recent Supreme Court decision that says government will actually permit subjects citizens to own guns was also quite a shock to her. But either way, she’s just absolutely terrified to know that I, personally, am armed.

Now I don’t live in Charlotte any more — primarily because of crime and insane taxes. But let me try and put your fears to rest, Miss Schulken, because I bet there are a few others like myself that do live in Charlotte:

I own guns. I own a number of different guns. I have revolvers, semi-automatic pistols, shotguns, and rifles. Yes, I even have one of those “banned” “assault” rifles. I have large pistols, and I have small ones — including one that I carry with me nearly everywhere I go. And know what, Miss Schulken? Not a one of my guns has killed an innocent person. Oh, but one time the mere presence of my shotgun did cause a group of about 8 “youths” from continuing to walk towards me when I was leaving work at 1am. I’ve had some of these guns as long as 15 years and never once has one killed someone by itself. I may have even once walked right past you in the city of Charlotte on the sidewalk, and you weren’t killed by my gun. Your fears are completely and totally unfounded.

Now I realize that you’re a female, so your emotions are more important than facts. I know that you, and many others like you, do not care that no one has been killed by my guns, you’re just plain terrified. I am sorry that my mere presence scares you. However, your emotions are not my responsibility. While I will point out that your fears have no basis in reality, I will not order you, nor will I force you to not be scared. And therein lies the difference between Miss Schulken and myself. I believe in freedom. I believe you should be free to have your emotions. You, however, do not believe that I should be free to protect myself from those who would do me harm.

People like you, Miss Schulken, scare me. It scares me that you would allow government to take away my means of protection so that the scum who would rob me would have more power than I do. It scares me that you would trust the government to protect you from others when you should take responsibility for yourself. However, if you do not want to take responsibility for yourself, I won’t force you to. But most of all it scares me that you want to use government force to stop me from taking responsibility for myself. You are the reason the Constitution exists: to protect me from people like yourself.

Popularity: 30% [?]

War on Freedom

So, do you think the war on freedom will ever end? I honestly don’t. I think it’s been going on for centuries, and while sometimes freedom gets ahead, the war on freedom will continue as long as governments exist. I was just reading an article about the next “war” — the possibly coming “war on illegals.” Now I don’t think that war is coming — neither Obama or McCain have ANY interest in stopping any illegals at any time. And no, the two of them honestly don’t care what YOU want, they will do what they want. But looking at the article, it writes about the various previous “wars” that are all utter and total failures:

The war on alcohol. How did prohibition work out? The war on poverty? $10 trillion and we still have poor people (and they STILL vote Democrat?). The war on drugs? Hundreds of completely innocent people dead. I think the big connection between all these is freedom. Government is the enemy of freedom. All these “wars” are about taking freedom away from otherwise law abiding, peaceful citizens that are not harming anyone.

And the war continues.

The latest is a “war” on gas prices and lending. Government is working hard to take away the freedom to invest money. Yes, because government wants to do something, and because their enemy is freedom, they’re trying to stop people from buying and selling oil. The only effect that will have is a loss of freedom. Oh, and slightly delayed increases in prices of gasoline. Government also wants to reduce economic freedom even more by stopping you from lending money. That’s right, if you have cash and want to lend it to someone, the government wants to stop you.

It’s a clear war on freedom, and the government is the enemy.

Popularity: 27% [?]

Happy Birthday

Happy Birthday, America. I wish these could be under happier circumstances. I wish this were a day to celebrate freedom. Unfortunately freedom in America simply does not exist. Perhaps these words, written so long ago, are needed again — this time directed AT Washington, DC. Read this, everyone, please:

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

—–

Replace “he” with “The Federal Government” in most of the list of complaints and you will find it quite accurate today, sadly.

Popularity: 33% [?]

Remember a Soldier

Today is the last day to join in with Remember a Soldier. Please go sponsor a care package now. It doesn’t matter your political affiliation. You should support these troops even if you don’t support the war. Do it now, please.

Popularity: 37% [?]

Illegal Religion

Are you aware that there are various countries around the world where you can be arrested simply for mentioning the words, “Jesus Christ?” I was just the other day talking with someone who had just returned from Laos. The government there puts up with people talking about Jesus, but only if it’s done in private. You’re allowed to go to a Christian church, but you are not allowed to invite anyone else to go with you. In fact, if you ask people who attend the church to accept Jesus Christ, “back pockets” will turn you in to the government and you will be jailed.

In China, things have been getting worse as the Olympics approach. The government in cities has started allowing churches to exist. You can have a church, and you can go to that church. But as with Laos, if you invite someone else to come to church with you, or if you attempt to tell someone about Jesus Christ, you will be jailed.

And did you know there’s another country that’s getting worse? Yes, it’s America. Right here in America, more and more, if you dare to mention Jesus Christ in public, you can be jailed. Sure, you’re allowed to go to a church, but if you show up in the wrong place and ask others to come with you, the government throws you in jail. As far as I can tell, the only difference regarding religious freedom in America and Laos is the time you spend in jail.

Popularity: 43% [?]

Unlimited Police Power

So, someone please tell me — is there anything at all that police are not allowed to do? They are apparently allowed to crash their cars and not pay for the destruction. And no, the government, their employer, won’t pay, either. And they’re allowed to break into private property because “it’s an emergency.”

Those unchecked rampaging power-mongers in Iowa are lucky to be alive, if you ask me. If I was in my house, cleaning up after a major flood, knowing there were few residents around; and someone shoved a crowbar in my door and started ripping it open, I’d have a loaded shotgun aimed at them. As soon as they entered my house, I’d pull the trigger in self-defense. And if you think that’s nuts, you should watch the video — these police aren’t asking if someone is home — they are forcibly breaking into houses, through doors and windows, without announcing themselves AT ALL. I am honestly surprised none have been killed — and the homeowners would be absolutely within their rights to defend themselves and their home. The Constitution used to be a check on these gross violations, but it’s clear that document simply does not apply.

Go ahead, tell me that they’re just “doing their job.” Tell me that they’re just “following orders.” Tell me that they’re doing it to “help” people.

Look, they’re committing gross Constitutional violations and many people are defending them. I wonder how many people would have defended Mr. Geiser. After all, Mr. Geiser was just following orders, too. Mr. Geiser was just doing what he was told, and it was for the betterment of society. And now we’re deporting Mr. Geiser for crimes he committed over 50 years ago. Isn’t it interesting that we will punish one set of policemen for criminal actions, but we won’t punish others? And yes, I think those people filmed in that link above should be in jail. It’s not “helpful” to me for you to break my door down and search my house because you want to.

Oh hey, let’s turn to the courts to settle the matter. Oh, right. The courts already have usurped power themselves. Can you name any limit on any branch of government that actually exists today? Go ahead, argue with that policeman about your rights — and you’ll be doing it from a jail cell.

Popularity: 27% [?]

Tom Harkin: No Donations Needed In Iowa

Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa has spoken: No one needs to do anything to help the people affected by this flood — because HE is going to help them, and he is going to help them with as much of your cash as HE wants. Nope, it doesn’t matter if you were going to give more or less, he will determine how much YOU will “donate” to “help” these people. No, it doesn’t matter if you were going to give thousands of dollars to people to help — HE will take thousands of dollars from you, use 70% of it to put in his pocket and other bureaucratic fees, and the people in Iowa will get the rest (he needs their votes, see).

It’s wrong, plain and simple. If we had ANY semblance of freedom in this country, this sort of heavy-handed money-grabbing would not even be considered. Tom Harkin should be jailed for robbery, not rewarded with votes. He has ZERO Constitutional authority to take cash from the people of Maine and give to people HE personally likes in Iowa. That’s WRONG. If we had ANY freedom in this country, we would be free to help these people with our own money! But when government shows up and takes over half of what we earn, we simply cannot afford it. But Tom Harkin DOES NOT CARE. He’s going to spend money YOU earn (and not one dime of his own money, rest assured) to provide “generous federal assistance.”

Tom Harkin, you are a selfish, miserable ass.

Popularity: 30% [?]

Rep Poe Gets It

We need more people like this in government:

I especially like that he points out that there’s no Constitutional authority for Congress to do this. Unfortunately, there is NO way to stop them. How do you challenge this law? Go sell a light bulb that’s illegal? Yeah, good luck with that — if you’re not a millionaire with expensive lawyers, you’re in jail, NOT challenging the clearly unconstitutional law.

But while I was watching this video, I was hoping and praying he was going to smash the bulb on the ground to make his point. That would have been priceless.

Popularity: 25% [?]

Public Schools Are Crap

Because they can “defend” their stupid decisions. I know some people think they can be saved, but I honestly believe they are beyond hope. Let them die a natural death. Start with removing all federal funding for education (and every single federal rule about education) — because that’s not actually in the Constitution anywhere. Then let states figure out how much THEY want to pay for this crap.

Popularity: 26% [?]

Gay Faith and Credit

So the news world is all abuzz over the new ability for same-sex “marriages” in California. And make no mistake about it, this is NOT gay “marriage.” Gays have ALWAYS had the ability to get married. They just didn’t like the fact that the word “marriage” applied to people of different sex. So the only new “right” here, completely invented by judges, in opposition to people, is same-sex “marriages.”

But one thing I keep hearing about is that California’s newly judge-discovered “right” lets non-residents of California “marry” a person of the same sex (or a dog, or many people, etc). And people are already claiming that because of the full credit and faith clause of the Constitution (sure, the left wants to use that thing now), other states will be forced to recognize same-sex “marriages” in their home states. I think that’s a damn load of crap, and if state government had any guts at all, this would be a complete non-issue. And I can find at least two ways that this is true.

First, why does the application of the “full faith and credit” clause only go one way? In other words, why can California decide they like a law, then they can FORCE every other state to have that same law, but it doesn’t work the other way? In other words, if NC judges created a law that said all people who engage in homosexual sex should be jailed, why shouldn’t California be FORCED to follow that law due to the “full faith and credit” clause? In addition, that clause actually says, “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.” That says EVERY OTHER state. In other words, if every single other state doesn’t have the same law, we should be able to ignore it.

At the same time, I can see another way that the rest of the states who don’t want to be forced to recognize this newly created toilet of a societal norm can easily apply it. It goes like this:

Sure, we, as a state, recognize that you, as North Carolina citizens, are “married” in California. We do not dispute that, and we give California the full faith and credit that you’re “married” there. But you’re not married here, so go suck eggs.

Oh, how I yearn for freedom.

Popularity: 24% [?]

Freedom of Speech? Not in America

I wish there were a country left in the world where people had freedom of religion. I wish there were a country left where people would be free to peaceably exercise their religion without going to jail. I wish there were a place where government did not prohibit the free exercise of religion. But as far as I can tell, there is no such place on this entire planet — and absolutely is not America.

Popularity: 19% [?]

Mexico: The Enemy?

So, if 31% of the population of a country thinks that another country is “the enemy,” how are relations between those countries? According to this report, 31% of Mexican citizens think of America as “The Enemy.” I think it shows, and I think they’re right. I believe that Mexico has staged a “peaceful” invasion of America for years now. They have been invading and trying to take over this country because we’re the enemy — and they are succeeding.

Strangely enough, their allies in American government don’t do too well in the poll. Their three biggest allies in Government — McCain, Obama, and Bush — who are all working very hard to completely remove the border between the two countries — all fare poorly in the poll. I wish those three would react to that poll and understand: THEY ARE THE ENEMY. These people want American land, and they’re going to take it. They don’t really care what American politicians do to help them or hinder them.

These “undocumented workers” ARE part of an illegal alien invasion force, no matter how much the media and their liberal allies want to claim that’s not true. It’s not about work, it’s not about a “better life” — it’s about expanding the borders of Mexico. And until our government admits it, we will continue losing.

Popularity: 23% [?]

Happy Father’s Day

Okay, so I’m a day late. And well, actually this is more directed to those who are fathers but not dads. And it’s directed at those who think they can be mothers without the father. And yes, it’s directed to those who think it’s a good idea that we have state-approved families that don’t include the fathers (that’s gay “marriages”). And this will completely leave out the arguments that you are forcing me to give up my religion when the state “marries” two people — this is based on the facts of what these “families” will do to children.

63% of youth suicides are children who don’t have fathers in their home.

Think about that for a minute. In 1998 there were 2,054 youth suicides. 1,294 of them were kids living without fathers. No, I’m not saying that all 1,294 would have lived if they had fathers in their homes, but what if 600 of them did? What if just one did?

90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.

Wow. 90%. In other words, if there were fathers in the homes, 90% of the children who are homeless would not be homeless. Imagine that — 90% of the homeless children would be taken care of by families. How much better would that be for society — and for those children?

85% of all youths sitting in prisons grew up in a fatherless home.

Eight-Five percent. In other words, if you want to reduce the prison population DRASTICALLY, all you have to do is put a father in the home of children. And today, behind support of the feminists and the gay movement, we’re doing our best to REMOVE as many fathers from homes as we can. In other words, our social policy is based on INCREASING the prison population. Great job, California.

Female children from fatherless homes are 6.6 times to become teen-aged mothers.

And how productive is that? After the recent fiasco in Texas, we know that there are lots and lots of kids having kids (mostly NOT children of religions like FLDS). And yet we encourage these families to be destroyed. Our society and laws today are built on “empowering” women — to create teen-aged mothers.

80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes.

There you go, feminists. Are you happy? By working hard to create a home where there’s only a mother who can do everything, you are creating rapists. Do you see that number? EIGHTY percent of those rapists! So if we stopped having fatherless homes, rape would DECREASE BY EIGHT PERCENT! Oh, but that wouldn’t be fair if we did that — at least according to those who support gay marriage and other such non-normal families.

The family consists of a father and a mother. Anything else is wrong, no matter what you want to call it, no matter how you want to frame it. And you see, the children KNOW this, even if you tell them otherwise. The children SHOW this, because they, in most cases, react very badly to growing up without a father in the home. 85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. It’s WRONG to live in a home without the father, plain and simple (and of course, I’m not talking about the abusive father, that’s outside of these figures and discussion).

If you are a father and you’re not living with the mother of your children, I implore you now to get up off your rear and go fix it. Nope, I don’t care what the excuse is. If you brought that child into the world, you need to raise them, period. If you’re a mother who isn’t living with that father, but can, you, too, need to get up now and fix it. Make a phone call. Send an e-mail. Heck, write a letter — but fix it now, before it’s too late. You two had to have some feelings for one another at one time, or there wouldn’t BE a child — so get back together now. Your children, and society, will thank you.

Popularity: 21% [?]

Camden Living Supports the Troops

I heard from Kender over the weekend about this story from St. Petersburg, FL. Always on Watch mentioned it, as did And Rightly So.

When the regional vice president of the company was asked about the case, he said:

“It’s important we’re consistent with the way we deal with people,” he said. “And the way we stay consistent is to follow that lease agreement.”

In other words, “We don’t give a damn. We want our cash, and we don’t care who has to pay it or how we get it. If the bum doesn’t have the money, we’ll sue him. If he leaves the country, we still want our cash. If he dies in combat operations as a member of the US Army, we’ll sue his damn estate.”

Okay, maybe he didn’t go that far, but claiming he wants to “be consistent” is a sorry damn cop out.

Popularity: 20% [?]

Quote of the Day

Found here:

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United Stated where men were free.” - President Ronald Reagan

You mean, Mr. Reagan, like right now, today? I can certainly tell a lot of stories right now of what it used to be like to be free in America.

Popularity: 25% [?]

Soldiers on the Fourth of July

Let’s show the members of the media that Americans really do support the troops, no matter what the media says or wants us to do. I like this idea.

Popularity: 25% [?]

Government Religion

So, what would you say is the official government religion of America? I think it might be quite possible to argue that it’s environmentalism. You might even be able to claim it’s atheism. An accurate statement might be that it’s anything BUT Christianity. But more troubling is that there is even a government-endorsed religion at all.

But hey, those are YOUR tax dollars that are being used to pay for a school where students learn to hate and learn about a religion that tells them to kill those who do not believe as they do. Anyone want to explain how that’s NOT a government endorsement of religion? Oh wait, I see now, it’s because the religion is Islam. Since Islam is on the preferred list of government endorsed religions, that’s okay.

You may attempt to argue that it’s the Saudi government that’s funding the jihad school in VA, but it’s on government property. How in the world can it be right for a foreign government to use American government property to promote the overthrow of the US government? Right, because it’s under the guide of one of the official US government religions.

Can you imagine if I wanted to just walk on government property and claim that Muslims are bad? Anyone want to place bets on how quickly I would be arrested, just while passing through government property? But since this is Islam, Virginia is allowing them to continue spreading their hatred, and they ARE using YOUR tax dollars to do it. I wish there were somewhere where one was free to exercise their religion. I wish there was somewhere that the government didn’t support one religion over another. And I wish there were a place where I were not forced to pay for religions I don’t agree with. But that place is clearly not the United States of America today.

Popularity: 24% [?]