Child Porn: Legal

Well, at least it is according to Fremont County Judge Timothy O’Grady. Mr. O’Grady, a judge, thinks that 12-year old girls dancing naked in a smoke-filled barroom while men drink beer and stare is just fine. He thinks that the activity of little underage girls prancing about with sexually suggestive moves in front of old perverted men is a “constitutionally protected activity.”

I just don’t even know how to answer that without violating a lot of laws myself. I’m going to make a guess that Mr. O’Grady doesn’t have any children, much less any female children. It’s bad enough that we have “people” who want to use and abuse young children sexually. Now this judge has made it legal to do everything but actually have sexual contact with them. I understand that there are people in this world that have an incredibly warped sense of right and wrong — I just wish those people weren’t judges.

I wonder how this person goes home at night and says, “Oh, I had a good day today, honey. I made sure it was legal for 14-year old girls to be strippers.” I don’t understand how he can sit up and actually DEFEND his actions. Well, I suppose if he were a member of NAMBLA, then it would make sense.

I don’t know the laws in Iowa. I don’t know how judges are placed on the bench. But if there’s any sense of justice left in Iowa (and no, I don’t really think there is) then the people should rise up and get this man out of his office. He belongs in a psychiatric ward, not judging laws for America.

Popularity: 14% [?]


Possibly similar posts - CA Schools: For Gays Only. - Rights In America - Anti-Abortion? Go To Jail. - Representative Republic? - TX Government and FLDS

3 Responses to “Child Porn: Legal”

  1. [...] Ogre has what is perhaps the most disturbing story of the day [...]

  2. ur retarded

  3. Well thanks for stopping by, q, and giving such a great response to the post!

Discussion Area - Leave a Comment