Vote for Change

So there’s a lot of people supporting lots of candidates for president. More than a few people are already sick of the campaigning — and even more haven’t even starting thinking about selecting one. Here in North Carolina, primaries are so late in the year that the presidential primary vote very seldom matters to anyone. But if you’re interested, no matter your party, think about what the different presidential candidates will do. Picture what America would be like in, say, 2010 or 2011 as compared to now…

President Giuliani: Guns might be restricted a little more. Amnesty will be pushed. Iraq/Afghanistan will be about the same. Government spending will increase. Taxes may increase. If Democrats control Congress, I’m thinking there would be almost no difference between Giuliani and Bush.

President Romney: Not buying health insurance might be illegal. Amnesty is likely. Iraq/Afghanistan will be about the same. Government spending will increase. Taxes may increase. If Democrats control Congress, I don’t see a difference between now and then.

President McCain: Freedom of speech may be limited more. Amnesty will be pushed. Iraq/Afghanistan may have more troops. Government spending will increase. Taxes may increase. If Democrats control Congress, yes, about the same.

President Huckabee: Education spending will increase. Amnesty is likely. Iraq/Afghanistan will be about the same. Government spending will increase massively. Taxes will be raised — a lot. If Democrats control Congress, much more of the same, but with even more spending.

President Thompson: There will be more laughs in news conferences. Amnesty may be pushed. Iraq/Afghanistan will be about the same. Government spending is likely to increase. Taxes may increase. If Democrats Control Congress, what’s the difference?

President Hunter: A fence might get built on the southern border. Amnesty won’t be pushed. Iraq/Afghanistan will be about the same. Government spending may increase, but only slightly. Taxes are likely to stay where they are. If Democrats control Congress, there may be a little more fighting, but not a lot of difference from now.

President Hillary: Socialized medicine will be put in full force with dissenters being jailed. Amnesty will be pushed. Iraq/Afghanistan will be about the same. Government spending will increase. Taxes will increase. More of the same.

President Obama: Democrats will be unhappy. Amnesty will be pushed. Iraq/Afghanistan will be about the same. Government spending will increase. Taxes will increase. More and more of the same.

Do you see a pattern here? Do you see why so many people aren’t “excited” about this election process? Nearly every candidate is simply more of the same with a few tiny differences. Seriously. These candidate will all just continue doing everything that’s going on now with just a few adjustments. According to polls (I know), most people are tired of more of the same. How about some real change?

President Ron Paul: The US will get out of the U.N. America won’t intervene militarily in other countries that don’t want us there. The IRS will go away. The federal department of Education will disappear! America will be a sovereign nation again. Social Security will be fixed. We will have secure borders and property rights. Government spending will decrease drastically. Taxes will be slashed. Americans will have freedom from government once again.

The more I find out about Ron Paul, the more excited I get. Join the Ron Paul Revolution now. Don’t listen to the people who claim he’s just wacko, they’re simply wrong — either that or they just think freedom is “wacko.” Vote for real change. Vote for Ron Paul.

Popularity: 4% [?]


Possibly similar posts - Who is Chuck Baldwin? - Ron Paul: Electable? - Congress on Free Speech - NC Primary Election Results - Chuck Baldwin for President?

10 Responses to “Vote for Change”

  1. Oh Lord, an excited Ogre could be dangerous… there goes the neighborhood!!! *chuckling*
    OK, now riddle me this. If Ron Paul becomes President Paul, how do we get people who will work with him in Congress???? I’m not sure Dems or Republicans will be in a big hurry to support him in the wildfire changes he wants to make Ogre. He may just become world class at using Vetos.
    Just wondering, before I risk everyone thinking I’m a wacko joining the Ron Paul camp, I’d like to know how hard I’m going to have to work at it! :-)

  2. First, I think a president that used the veto on 3/4 of everything Congress does would be a good darn start! Seriously. I’d LOVE to see that. But I think to make bigger changes is going to take more — once Paul gets elected, people will really see what he stands for and why it works. Then others can join him. I think it would take at least the next Congressional election to make bigger changes and elect more Paul supporters to Congress.

    Either that or the country will rebel against Paul and just elect total socialists to Congress and the Free State will be the only place left with freedom.

  3. I am seriously considering doing the “Free State” commitment. I just wish they had chose a warmer climate!
    LOL!!! Seriously though, I guess change for the good always comes in slow, deliberate phases. I know I would like to live out the rest of my life with more freedom, not less.

  4. It’s funny, but the biggest complaint about New Hampshire is the cold. I think that’s really funny — is the biggest obstacle to freedom the weather? ;)

  5. Only when your 50 something and sick of snow! I guess I could give up shovelling and buy a snow blower, snowmobile and long johns, eh? LOL!!! I just sooo wanted to be a southern belle in my retirement! :-) I think I’d be good at it!

  6. Or you could move to an apartment where they do that stuff for you! :)

  7. You know, that would rock! I’ve been a homeowner for so long (getting screwed on taxes and paying maintenence!) I forgot how cool (and free) renting can be. Or even buying into a condo that is in a “complex or building” would be cool.
    No maintence or tax costs! That is a brilliant thought.

  8. I’ve considered it myself — especially since you can’t really own property any more in this country, anyway.

  9. Kinda hard to rent property in the “sticks” though.

  10. Well pretty much all of New Hampshire is the sticks, even the cities there…

Discussion Area - Leave a Comment