Obama’s Church
Posted on January 9th, 2008 by Ogre
So, have you heard about the church that Obama claims as home? Now I’m not saying that Obama agrees completely with the positions of his church — but he does claim it as his home and he doesn’t openly deny any of the church’s positions. So, would you like someone to be President of the United States who agrees with these ideas?
A non-negotiable commitment to Africa.
A church that only allows “African people.”
Committed to economic parity (that’s pure socialism).
There is no mention of any support for the country that allows these people to be so racist — America. I wonder if Obama will ever mention these statements. I’m willing to be no media outlet will ask him about his church’s positions.
Popularity: 4% [?]
Possibly similar posts - Obama at Saddleback - Illegal Religion - Then There Were Three - Another Firing For Religion - President Obama
Considering the fact that he deems wearing a flag lapel pin like the rest of the members of Congress to be offensive and doesn’t honor those who have shed their blood and gave their lives for our country by putting his hand on his heart during the national anthem… he is about as un-American as he can be.
The idea of him being elected President, quite frankly, makes me sick! I have no use for any man wanting to lead a country that he so obviously hates and resents!
JMHO!!!
I would not want to be a Democrat today, trying to decide between Obama and Hillary. Maybe that’s why Edwards gets so many votes…
Hmmmm…..A black-supremacist church?
Kind of an oxymoron eh????
And Obama has said he is a proud member of said church.
As I’ve said elsewhere, in my view, the most alarming parts of Obama’s Church’s “10 Point Vision” are 4 and 10.
“4. A congregation with a ‘non-negotiable’ COMMITMENT TO AFRICA” (emphasis in the original).
If I offer to sell you my car for $30,000 and I tell you that the price is “non-negotiable” that means that either you pay me $30,000 or there’s no deal–take it or leave it. “Non-negotiable” leaves no room for ambiguity. “Non-negotiable” means non-negotiable.
Therefore, since there’s NO DISPUTE that he’s a member of the “congregation”, and that the congregation has a “non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA”, it is impossible for him to faithfully take his Oath of Office as a United States Senator, President, or any other public office for that matter. Toward that end, there can be little doubt that the interests of the United States and the interests of any one of the nations of Africa, or any other nation, are perpetually in dispute, at one level or another. By definition, you can’t have both a non-negotiable commitment to the United States and to the continent of Africa.
If the words “Black” and “Africa” were replaced on Obama’s Church’s website with “White” and “Germany”, this man would be labeled a “White Separtist” by the media, and his political career would immediatly be over.
“10. A congregation working towards ECONOMIC PARITY”
By definition, economic parity means communism–plainly.
So, in sum, Mr. Obama belongs to a Black Separatist Church that is working toward communism. It’s their words, not mine.
This ought to do a lot to allay the fears of people who believe that Obama is a left-wing radical (sarcasm intended).
Exactly right. I guess it really lets you know what the media wants in their candidates, eh?